Panasonic EVPV400H vs JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W
The Panasonic EVPV400H wins this comparison by a decisive margin. It leads in efficiency (21.2% vs 20.8%) and matches or exceeds on warranty (25 vs 12 years). For most residential installations, the Panasonic EVPV400H is the stronger choice.
Key Differences
- • Both panels are rated at 400W, so the comparison comes down to efficiency, warranty, and technology.
- • Panasonic EVPV400H achieves 21.2% efficiency vs 20.8% for the other, a 0.4 percentage point gap.
- • Panasonic EVPV400H comes with a 25-year product warranty vs 12 years for the other.
- • Panasonic EVPV400H has a superior temperature coefficient of -0.26%/°C vs -0.35%/°C, retaining more power in hot climates.
- • Panasonic EVPV400H uses HJT (Heterojunction) cells while JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W uses PERC Mono cells, representing different technology generations.
Specifications Breakdown
Module Efficiency
The Panasonic EVPV400H achieves 21.2% module efficiency compared to JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W's 20.8%, meaning Panasonic EVPV400H converts 0.4 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the Panasonic EVPV400H produces 204.8 watts per square meter of panel area while the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W produces 200.2 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.
Power Output
Both panels are rated at 400W under standard test conditions (STC), requiring 20 panels each to build an 8 kW system. With identical wattage ratings, the power output dimension is a draw and does not favor either panel. The real differentiators become efficiency density, temperature behavior, and long-term degradation rates which determine actual field performance beyond the nameplate rating.
Temperature Coefficient
The Panasonic EVPV400H has a temperature coefficient of -0.26%/°C versus -0.35%/°C for the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W. On a hot summer day when cell temperature reaches 65°C (40°C above the 25°C STC baseline), the Panasonic EVPV400H retains 94.8% of its rated power while the other retains 93.0%. This difference is particularly significant in hot climates such as the American Southwest, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia, where panels routinely operate 30-40°C above STC for several hours each day. Over the system lifetime, the cumulative energy advantage from a better temperature coefficient can amount to 2-4% of total production.
Warranty Coverage
The Panasonic EVPV400H is backed by a 25-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee, while the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W offers 12-year product and 25-year performance coverage. The Panasonic EVPV400H provides 13 additional years of defect protection, covering manufacturing issues, material failures, and premature performance loss. Based on their published degradation rates (0.5% first year then 0.35%/year for Panasonic EVPV400H; 1.5% first year then 0.5%/year for JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W), after 25 years the Panasonic EVPV400H should retain approximately 91.1% of original output versus 86.5% for the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W. This 4.6 percentage point gap in end-of-life output meaningfully impacts lifetime energy economics.
Physical Dimensions & Weight
The Panasonic EVPV400H measures 1722×1134×30mm and weighs 21 kg, while the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W measures 1762×1134×30mm at 22 kg. 1.95 m² of panel area for the Panasonic EVPV400H versus 2.00 m² for the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W. Their weights are closely matched, so neither panel imposes a significantly different structural load on the mounting system. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.
Specification Comparison
| Specification | Panasonic EVPV400H | JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400W | 400W |
| Efficiency | 21.2% | 20.8% |
| Power Density | 19.0 W/sq ft | 18.6 W/sq ft |
| Cell Type | HJT (Heterojunction) | PERC Mono |
| Bifacial | Yes | No |
| Weight | 21 kg | 22 kg |
| Temp Coefficient | -0.26%/°C | -0.35%/°C |
| Snow Load | 5400 Pa | 5400 Pa |
| Wind Load | 2400 Pa | 2400 Pa |
| Product Warranty | 25 years | 12 years |
| Performance Warranty | 25 years | 25 years |
| Degradation (Year 1) | 0.5% | 1.5% |
| Annual Degradation | 0.35% | 0.5% |
| Country | Japan | China |
5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis
1. Efficiency & Power Density
Winner: Panasonic EVPV400HThe Panasonic EVPV400H achieves 21.2% efficiency versus 20.8% — a 0.4 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 0.0 kW more total system capacity, or 0 kWh more annual production in an average US location.
2. Hot Climate Performance
Winner: Panasonic EVPV400HThe Panasonic EVPV400H has a better temperature coefficient of -0.26%/°C versus -0.35%/°C. On a 45°C summer day (20°C above STC), the winner retains 94.8% of rated power versus 93.0%. This is a meaningful difference in hot states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida.
3. Durability & Warranty
Winner: Panasonic EVPV400HPanasonic EVPV400H leads with a 25-year product warranty versus 12 years. Panasonic EVPV400H degrades more slowly at 0.35% per year versus 0.5%. After 25 years, expect 91.1% vs 86.5% of original output for Panasonic EVPV400H and JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W respectively.
4. Power Output
Winner: TieBoth panels deliver 400W — identical power output per panel. System cost per watt will be the deciding factor.
5. Cell Technology
Winner: Panasonic EVPV400HThe Panasonic EVPV400H uses HJT (Heterojunction): HJT (Heterojunction) combines crystalline silicon with amorphous silicon layers, delivering the best temperature coefficient and bifacial gains, but at higher manufacturing cost. The JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W uses PERC Mono: PERC (Passivated Emitter Rear Cell) is the current mainstream technology, offering good efficiency at the lowest manufacturing cost. HJT (Heterojunction) represents a newer generation technology with a longer performance runway as manufacturing matures.
Panasonic EVPV400H
DISCONTINUED: Panasonic exited solar manufacturing in 2023. The EVPV400H was Panasonic's standard HJT residential panel, delivering 400W with the brand's signature quality and longevity.
Pros
- + Panasonic reliability
- + HJT advantages
- + Solid 25-year warranty
- + Good all-round performer
Cons
- - DISCONTINUED - no longer manufactured
- - No new units available
- - No ongoing product support
JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W
The Tiger Pro 60HC delivers 400W using PERC technology in a half-cut cell design for improved shade tolerance and reliability.
Pros
- + Proven PERC technology
- + Half-cut cell design
- + Good shade tolerance
- + Affordable
Cons
- - Older technology
- - Lower efficiency
- - Standard warranty
Choose Panasonic EVPV400H If...
- ✓ Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
- ✓ Long-term warranty protection is a top priority and you plan to stay in your home for 25+ years
- ✓ You live in a hot climate (Arizona, Texas, Florida) where heat performance matters
- ✓ You want maximum output retention over the system's 25-30 year lifespan
- ✓ You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
Choose JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W If...
- ✓ Budget installations wanting proven JinkoSolar reliability at a lower price.
Our Recommendation
The Panasonic EVPV400H is the decisive winner in this solar panel comparison, outperforming the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W in 4 of 5 dimensions. Unless you have a specific requirement that the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W uniquely addresses, the Panasonic EVPV400H is the stronger choice for virtually every installation scenario.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Panasonic EVPV400H or JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W?
The Panasonic EVPV400H wins this comparison by a decisive margin. It leads in efficiency (21.2% vs 20.8%) and matches or exceeds on warranty (25 vs 12 years). For most residential installations, the Panasonic EVPV400H is the stronger choice.
Which panel is more efficient, Panasonic EVPV400H or JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W?
The Panasonic EVPV400H at 21.2% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 0.4 percentage points translates to approximately 0W per panel under standard test conditions.
Which has a better warranty, Panasonic EVPV400H or JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W?
The Panasonic EVPV400H comes with a 25-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee. The JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W offers 12-year product and 25-year performance warranties. Panasonic EVPV400H provides 13 additional years of product coverage.
Which panel performs better in hot weather?
The Panasonic EVPV400H has a temperature coefficient of -0.26%/°C and the JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W is -0.35%/°C. Panasonic EVPV400H retains more power in heat — important in states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.
How many Panasonic EVPV400H vs JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?
For an 8 kW system: you need 20 Panasonic EVPV400H panels (400W each) or 20 JinkoSolar Tiger Pro 60HC 400W panels (400W each). Both require the same number of panels.
Related Resources
Last updated: February 2026