JA Solar JAM54S31 415W vs Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W
The Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W wins this comparison by a narrow margin. It delivers more power (460W vs 415W). For most residential installations, the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W is the stronger choice.
Key Differences
- • JA Solar JAM54S31 415W is rated at 415W while Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W is rated at 460W, a 45W difference.
- • JA Solar JAM54S31 415W achieves 21.5% efficiency vs 21.3% for the other, a 0.2 percentage point gap.
- • Both carry matching 12-year product warranties.
Specifications Breakdown
Module Efficiency
The JA Solar JAM54S31 415W achieves 21.5% module efficiency compared to Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W's 21.3%, meaning JA Solar JAM54S31 415W converts 0.2 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the JA Solar JAM54S31 415W produces 212.5 watts per square meter of panel area while the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W produces 230.2 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.
Power Output
The Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W delivers 460W per panel versus 415W for the JA Solar JAM54S31 415W, a 45W difference per module. To build an 8 kW residential system, you would need 20 JA Solar JAM54S31 415W panels or 18 Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W panels. Choosing the higher-wattage option saves 2 panels, reducing total racking hardware, wiring, and installation labor costs. Higher wattage per panel is particularly valuable for commercial-scale installations where panel count directly impacts balance-of-system costs.
Temperature Coefficient
Both panels share an identical temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C, meaning they lose power at the same rate as cell temperature rises above the 25°C standard test baseline. At 65°C cell temperature, both retain 93.2% of rated power. Neither panel has a thermal performance advantage, which makes this specification a non-factor in the comparison.
Warranty Coverage
The JA Solar JAM54S31 415W is backed by a 12-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee, while the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W offers 12-year product and 25-year performance coverage. Both offer identical product warranty duration. Based on their published degradation rates (1.5% first year then 0.5%/year for JA Solar JAM54S31 415W; 1.5% first year then 0.5%/year for Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W), after 25 years the JA Solar JAM54S31 415W should retain approximately 86.5% of original output versus 86.5% for the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W. The end-of-life output levels are closely matched.
Physical Dimensions & Weight
The JA Solar JAM54S31 415W measures 1722×1134×30mm and weighs 21.5 kg, while the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W measures 1762×1134×30mm at 23 kg. 1.95 m² of panel area for the JA Solar JAM54S31 415W versus 2.00 m² for the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W. Their weights are closely matched, so neither panel imposes a significantly different structural load on the mounting system. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.
Specification Comparison
| Specification | JA Solar JAM54S31 415W | Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 415W | 460W |
| Efficiency | 21.5% | 21.3% |
| Power Density | 19.7 W/sq ft | 21.4 W/sq ft |
| Cell Type | PERC Mono | PERC Mono |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |
| Weight | 21.5 kg | 23 kg |
| Temp Coefficient | -0.34%/°C | -0.34%/°C |
| Snow Load | 5400 Pa | 5400 Pa |
| Wind Load | 2400 Pa | 2400 Pa |
| Product Warranty | 12 years | 12 years |
| Performance Warranty | 25 years | 25 years |
| Degradation (Year 1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Annual Degradation | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Country | China | China |
5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis
1. Efficiency & Power Density
Winner: JA Solar JAM54S31 415WThe JA Solar JAM54S31 415W achieves 21.5% efficiency versus 21.3% — a 0.2 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 1.4 kW more total system capacity, or 7 kWh more annual production in an average US location.
2. Hot Climate Performance
Winner: TieBoth panels share a temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C — identical heat tolerance.
3. Durability & Warranty
Winner: TieBoth panels offer identical 12-year product warranties and 0.5% annual degradation. Neither has a durability advantage.
4. Power Output
Winner: Astronergy ASTRO N5 460WThe Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W delivers 460W versus 415W per panel — 45W more. For an 8 kW system, you need 18 panels with the higher-wattage option versus 20 panels, saving 2 panels and the associated racking and labor costs.
5. Cell Technology
Winner: TieBoth panels use PERC Mono cell technology. No technology advantage for either product.
JA Solar JAM54S31 415W
The JAM54S31 is a compact residential PERC panel delivering 415W with a solid balance of performance and affordability.
Pros
- + Compact residential form factor
- + Good price-performance ratio
- + Widely available
- + Proven reliability
Cons
- - Lower efficiency vs N-type
- - Higher degradation rate
- - Standard warranty
Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W
The ASTRO N5 is a mid-range PERC panel delivering 460W for residential and commercial installations at a value price point.
Pros
- + Good value per watt
- + Mid-size format
- + CHINT Group backing
- + Widely available globally
Cons
- - Older PERC technology
- - Standard efficiency
- - Less known in US
Choose JA Solar JAM54S31 415W If...
- ✓ Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
- ✓ Budget residential installations seeking reliable PERC performance.
Choose Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W If...
- ✓ You want fewer panels to reach your target system size, reducing racking and labor costs
- ✓ Value-oriented projects seeking competitive PERC pricing from a global manufacturer.
Our Recommendation
Both the JA Solar JAM54S31 415W and Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W are excellent solar panel options, and the margin between them is narrow. The Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W wins 1 of 5 comparison dimensions by a slim margin. Your decision may come down to local pricing, installer availability, and which specific performance metrics matter most for your project. Either product is a solid investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, JA Solar JAM54S31 415W or Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W?
The Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W wins this comparison by a narrow margin. It delivers more power (460W vs 415W). For most residential installations, the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W is the stronger choice.
Which panel is more efficient, JA Solar JAM54S31 415W or Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W?
The JA Solar JAM54S31 415W at 21.5% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 0.2 percentage points translates to approximately 45W per panel under standard test conditions.
Which has a better warranty, JA Solar JAM54S31 415W or Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W?
The JA Solar JAM54S31 415W comes with a 12-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee. The Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W offers 12-year product and 25-year performance warranties. Both offer identical warranty terms.
Which panel performs better in hot weather?
The JA Solar JAM54S31 415W has a temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C and the Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W is -0.34%/°C. Both handle heat equally. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.
How many JA Solar JAM54S31 415W vs Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?
For an 8 kW system: you need 20 JA Solar JAM54S31 415W panels (415W each) or 18 Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W panels (460W each). The Astronergy ASTRO N5 460W requires fewer panels, saving on racking hardware and installation labor.
Related Resources
Last updated: February 2026