Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W vs Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W
The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W wins this comparison by a narrow margin. It delivers more power (415W vs 410W). For most residential installations, the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W is the stronger choice.
Key Differences
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is rated at 410W while Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W is rated at 415W, a 5W difference.
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W achieves 21.3% efficiency vs 21.25% for the other, a 0.1 percentage point gap.
- • Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W comes with a 30-year product warranty vs 25 years for the other.
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a superior temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C vs -0.32%/°C, retaining more power in hot climates.
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W uses TOPCon N-type cells while Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W uses PERC Mono Bifacial cells, representing different technology generations.
Specifications Breakdown
Module Efficiency
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W achieves 21.3% module efficiency compared to Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W's 21.25%, meaning Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W converts 0.1 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W produces 210.0 watts per square meter of panel area while the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W produces 212.5 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.
Power Output
The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W delivers 415W per panel versus 410W for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W, a 5W difference per module. To build an 8 kW residential system, you would need 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels or 20 Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W panels. Despite the per-panel wattage difference, both require the same number of panels for this system size due to rounding. Higher wattage per panel is particularly valuable for commercial-scale installations where panel count directly impacts balance-of-system costs.
Temperature Coefficient
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C versus -0.32%/°C for the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W. On a hot summer day when cell temperature reaches 65°C (40°C above the 25°C STC baseline), the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W retains 94.2% of its rated power while the other retains 93.6%. While the numerical gap is modest, it still accumulates over decades of summer production, especially in southern latitudes with prolonged peak heat hours.
Warranty Coverage
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is backed by a 25-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee, while the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W offers 30-year product and 30-year performance coverage. The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W provides 5 additional years of defect protection, covering manufacturing issues, material failures, and premature performance loss. Based on their published degradation rates (1% first year then 0.4%/year for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W; 1% first year then 0.54%/year for Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W), after 25 years the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W should retain approximately 89.4% of original output versus 86.0% for the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W. This 3.4 percentage point gap in end-of-life output meaningfully impacts lifetime energy economics.
Physical Dimensions & Weight
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W measures 1722×1134×30mm and weighs 20.8 kg, while the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W measures 1722×1134×35mm at 22 kg. 1.95 m² of panel area for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W versus 1.95 m² for the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W. Their weights are closely matched, so neither panel imposes a significantly different structural load on the mounting system. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.
Specification Comparison
| Specification | Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W | Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410W | 415W |
| Efficiency | 21.3% | 21.25% |
| Power Density | 19.5 W/sq ft | 19.7 W/sq ft |
| Cell Type | TOPCon N-type | PERC Mono Bifacial |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |
| Weight | 20.8 kg | 22 kg |
| Temp Coefficient | -0.29%/°C | -0.32%/°C |
| Snow Load | 5400 Pa | 5400 Pa |
| Wind Load | 2400 Pa | 4000 Pa |
| Product Warranty | 25 years | 30 years |
| Performance Warranty | 25 years | 30 years |
| Degradation (Year 1) | 1% | 1% |
| Annual Degradation | 0.4% | 0.54% |
| Country | South Korea | Vietnam |
5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis
1. Efficiency & Power Density
Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410WThe Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W achieves 21.3% efficiency versus 21.25% — a 0.1 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 0.1 kW more total system capacity, or 1 kWh more annual production in an average US location.
2. Hot Climate Performance
Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410WThe Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a better temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C versus -0.32%/°C. On a 45°C summer day (20°C above STC), the winner retains 94.2% of rated power versus 93.6%. The difference is modest but accumulates over 25 years of summer production.
3. Durability & Warranty
Winner: Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415WAptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W leads with a 30-year product warranty versus 25 years. Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W degrades more slowly at 0.4% per year versus 0.54%. After 25 years, expect 89.4% vs 86.0% of original output for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W and Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W respectively.
4. Power Output
Winner: Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415WThe Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W delivers 415W versus 410W per panel — 5W more. For an 8 kW system, you need 20 panels with the higher-wattage option versus 20 panels, saving 0 panels and the associated racking and labor costs.
5. Cell Technology
Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410WThe Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W uses TOPCon N-type: TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) adds a thin tunnel oxide layer to reduce recombination losses, achieving higher efficiency than PERC while being manufacturable on existing production lines. The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W uses PERC Mono Bifacial: PERC (Passivated Emitter Rear Cell) is the current mainstream technology, offering good efficiency at the lowest manufacturing cost. TOPCon N-type represents a newer generation technology with a longer performance runway as manufacturing matures.
Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S delivers 410W N-type TOPCon performance in a compact residential format with a strong 25-year warranty.
Pros
- + 25-year product warranty
- + N-type TOPCon cells
- + Compact size
- + Korean quality
Cons
- - Moderate wattage
- - Premium pricing
- - Limited color options
Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W
Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 is a 415W bifacial residential panel with up to 30% rear-side energy gain using patented DNA technology and 108 half-cut cells.
Pros
- + Bifacial design captures up to 30% additional rear-side energy
- + 30-year dual warranty for product and performance
- + Compact 108-cell format for residential rooftops
- + All-black aesthetic
Cons
- - Bifacial gain requires reflective ground surface or elevated mounting
- - PERC technology vs newer N-type alternatives
- - Slightly heavier than monofacial version
Choose Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W If...
- ✓ Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
- ✓ You live in a hot climate (Arizona, Texas, Florida) where heat performance matters
- ✓ You want maximum output retention over the system's 25-30 year lifespan
- ✓ You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
- ✓ Residential installations valuing Korean quality with strong warranty.
Choose Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W If...
- ✓ You want fewer panels to reach your target system size, reducing racking and labor costs
- ✓ Long-term warranty protection is a top priority and you plan to stay in your home for 30+ years
- ✓ Homeowners with ground-mount or elevated roof installations who want additional energy from bifacial rear-side capture.
Our Recommendation
Both the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W and Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W are excellent solar panel options, and the margin between them is narrow. The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W wins 2 of 5 comparison dimensions by a slim margin. Your decision may come down to local pricing, installer availability, and which specific performance metrics matter most for your project. Either product is a solid investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W or Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W?
The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W wins this comparison by a narrow margin. It delivers more power (415W vs 410W). For most residential installations, the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W is the stronger choice.
Which panel is more efficient, Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W or Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W at 21.3% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 0.1 percentage points translates to approximately 5W per panel under standard test conditions.
Which has a better warranty, Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W or Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W comes with a 25-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee. The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W offers 30-year product and 30-year performance warranties. Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W provides 5 additional years of product coverage.
Which panel performs better in hot weather?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C and the Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W is -0.32%/°C. Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W retains more power in heat — important in states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.
How many Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W vs Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?
For an 8 kW system: you need 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels (410W each) or 20 Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W panels (415W each). The Aptos Solar DNA-108-BF10 415W requires fewer panels, saving on racking hardware and installation labor.
Related Resources
Last updated: February 2026