Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W vs JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a decisive margin. It offers better long-term durability with 25-year warranty. For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.
Key Differences
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is rated at 410W while JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W is rated at 430W, a 20W difference.
- • JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W achieves 22% efficiency vs 21.3% for the other, a 0.7 percentage point gap.
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W comes with a 25-year product warranty vs 15 years for the other.
Specifications Breakdown
Module Efficiency
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W achieves 22% module efficiency compared to Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W's 21.3%, meaning JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W converts 0.7 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W produces 210.0 watts per square meter of panel area while the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W produces 220.2 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.
Power Output
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W delivers 430W per panel versus 410W for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W, a 20W difference per module. To build an 8 kW residential system, you would need 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels or 19 JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W panels. Choosing the higher-wattage option saves 1 panel, reducing total racking hardware, wiring, and installation labor costs. Higher wattage per panel is particularly valuable for commercial-scale installations where panel count directly impacts balance-of-system costs.
Temperature Coefficient
Both panels share an identical temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C, meaning they lose power at the same rate as cell temperature rises above the 25°C standard test baseline. At 65°C cell temperature, both retain 94.2% of rated power. Neither panel has a thermal performance advantage, which makes this specification a non-factor in the comparison.
Warranty Coverage
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is backed by a 25-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee, while the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W offers 15-year product and 30-year performance coverage. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W provides 10 additional years of defect protection, covering manufacturing issues, material failures, and premature performance loss. Based on their published degradation rates (1% first year then 0.4%/year for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W; 1% first year then 0.4%/year for JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W), after 25 years the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W should retain approximately 89.4% of original output versus 89.4% for the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W. The end-of-life output levels are closely matched.
Physical Dimensions & Weight
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W measures 1722×1134×30mm and weighs 20.8 kg, while the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W measures 1722×1134×30mm at 21 kg. 1.95 m² of panel area for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W versus 1.95 m² for the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W. Their weights are closely matched, so neither panel imposes a significantly different structural load on the mounting system. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.
Specification Comparison
| Specification | Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W | JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410W | 430W |
| Efficiency | 21.3% | 22% |
| Power Density | 19.5 W/sq ft | 20.5 W/sq ft |
| Cell Type | TOPCon N-type | TOPCon N-type |
| Bifacial | No | Yes |
| Weight | 20.8 kg | 21 kg |
| Temp Coefficient | -0.29%/°C | -0.29%/°C |
| Snow Load | 5400 Pa | 5400 Pa |
| Wind Load | 2400 Pa | 2400 Pa |
| Product Warranty | 25 years | 15 years |
| Performance Warranty | 25 years | 30 years |
| Degradation (Year 1) | 1% | 1% |
| Annual Degradation | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Country | South Korea | China |
5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis
1. Efficiency & Power Density
Winner: JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430WThe JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W achieves 22% efficiency versus 21.3% — a 0.7 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 0.6 kW more total system capacity, or 3 kWh more annual production in an average US location.
2. Hot Climate Performance
Winner: TieBoth panels share a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C — identical heat tolerance.
3. Durability & Warranty
Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410WHanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W leads with a 25-year product warranty versus 15 years. After 25 years, expect 89.4% vs 89.4% of original output for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W and JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W respectively.
4. Power Output
Winner: JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430WThe JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W delivers 430W versus 410W per panel — 20W more. For an 8 kW system, you need 19 panels with the higher-wattage option versus 20 panels, saving 1 panels and the associated racking and labor costs.
5. Cell Technology
Winner: TieBoth panels use TOPCon N-type cell technology. No technology advantage for either product.
Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S delivers 410W N-type TOPCon performance in a compact residential format with a strong 25-year warranty.
Pros
- + 25-year product warranty
- + N-type TOPCon cells
- + Compact size
- + Korean quality
Cons
- - Moderate wattage
- - Premium pricing
- - Limited color options
JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W
The Tiger Neo S is JinkoSolar's compact N-type residential panel, delivering 430W in a space-efficient format for standard roof sizes.
Pros
- + Compact N-type panel
- + Good residential size
- + JinkoSolar quality
- + 30-year warranty
Cons
- - Lower wattage vs larger models
- - Moderate efficiency
- - Standard sizing
Choose Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W If...
- ✓ Long-term warranty protection is a top priority and you plan to stay in your home for 25+ years
- ✓ You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
- ✓ Residential installations valuing Korean quality with strong warranty.
Choose JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W If...
- ✓ Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
- ✓ You want fewer panels to reach your target system size, reducing racking and labor costs
- ✓ You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
- ✓ Standard residential rooftops wanting compact N-type performance from JinkoSolar.
Our Recommendation
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the decisive winner in this solar panel comparison, outperforming the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W in 1 of 5 dimensions. Unless you have a specific requirement that the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W uniquely addresses, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice for virtually every installation scenario.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W or JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a decisive margin. It offers better long-term durability with 25-year warranty. For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.
Which panel is more efficient, Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W or JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W?
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W at 22% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 0.7 percentage points translates to approximately 20W per panel under standard test conditions.
Which has a better warranty, Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W or JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W comes with a 25-year product warranty and 25-year performance guarantee. The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W offers 15-year product and 30-year performance warranties. Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W provides 10 additional years of product coverage.
Which panel performs better in hot weather?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C and the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W is -0.29%/°C. Both handle heat equally. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.
How many Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W vs JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?
For an 8 kW system: you need 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels (410W each) or 19 JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W panels (430W each). The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo S 430W requires fewer panels, saving on racking hardware and installation labor.
Related Resources
Last updated: February 2026