Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W vs Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

Our Verdict Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a narrow margin. It leads in efficiency (21.3% vs 21.2%) and matches or exceeds on warranty (25 vs 25 years). For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.

Power / Capacity
410W
vs
410W
Efficiency
21.2%
vs
21.3%
Warranty
25 yrs
vs
25 yrs

Key Differences

  • Both panels are rated at 410W, so the comparison comes down to efficiency, warranty, and technology.
  • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W achieves 21.3% efficiency vs 21.2% for the other, a 0.1 percentage point gap.
  • Both carry matching 25-year product warranties.
  • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a superior temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C vs -0.34%/°C, retaining more power in hot climates.
  • Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W uses PERC Mono cells while Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W uses TOPCon N-type cells, representing different technology generations.

Specifications Breakdown

Module Efficiency

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W achieves 21.3% module efficiency compared to Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W's 21.2%, meaning Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W converts 0.1 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W produces 210.0 watts per square meter of panel area while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W produces 210.0 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.

Power Output

Both panels are rated at 410W under standard test conditions (STC), requiring 20 panels each to build an 8 kW system. With identical wattage ratings, the power output dimension is a draw and does not favor either panel. The real differentiators become efficiency density, temperature behavior, and long-term degradation rates which determine actual field performance beyond the nameplate rating.

Temperature Coefficient

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C versus -0.34%/°C for the Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W. On a hot summer day when cell temperature reaches 65°C (40°C above the 25°C STC baseline), the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W retains 94.2% of its rated power while the other retains 93.2%. This difference is particularly significant in hot climates such as the American Southwest, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia, where panels routinely operate 30-40°C above STC for several hours each day. Over the system lifetime, the cumulative energy advantage from a better temperature coefficient can amount to 2-4% of total production.

Warranty Coverage

The Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W is backed by a 25-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee, while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W offers 25-year product and 25-year performance coverage. Both offer identical product warranty duration. Based on their published degradation rates (1% first year then 0.4%/year for Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W; 1% first year then 0.4%/year for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W), after 25 years the Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W should retain approximately 89.4% of original output versus 89.4% for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W. The end-of-life output levels are closely matched.

Physical Dimensions & Weight

The Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W measures 1722×1134×30mm and weighs 21 kg, while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W measures 1722×1134×30mm at 20.8 kg. 1.95 m² of panel area for the Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W versus 1.95 m² for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W. Their weights are closely matched, so neither panel imposes a significantly different structural load on the mounting system. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.

Specification Comparison

Specification Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W
Power 410W 410W
Efficiency 21.2% 21.3%
Power Density 19.5 W/sq ft 19.5 W/sq ft
Cell Type PERC Mono TOPCon N-type
Bifacial No No
Weight 21 kg 20.8 kg
Temp Coefficient -0.34%/°C -0.29%/°C
Snow Load 5400 Pa 5400 Pa
Wind Load 2400 Pa 2400 Pa
Product Warranty 25 years 25 years
Performance Warranty 30 years 25 years
Degradation (Year 1) 1% 1%
Annual Degradation 0.4% 0.4%
Country United States South Korea

5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis

1. Efficiency & Power Density

Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W achieves 21.3% efficiency versus 21.2% — a 0.1 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 0.0 kW more total system capacity, or 0 kWh more annual production in an average US location.

2. Hot Climate Performance

Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W has a better temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C versus -0.34%/°C. On a 45°C summer day (20°C above STC), the winner retains 94.2% of rated power versus 93.2%. This is a meaningful difference in hot states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida.

3. Durability & Warranty

Winner: Tie

Both panels offer identical 25-year product warranties and 0.4% annual degradation. Neither has a durability advantage.

4. Power Output

Winner: Tie

Both panels deliver 410W — identical power output per panel. System cost per watt will be the deciding factor.

5. Cell Technology

Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W uses PERC Mono: PERC (Passivated Emitter Rear Cell) is the current mainstream technology, offering good efficiency at the lowest manufacturing cost. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W uses TOPCon N-type: TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) adds a thin tunnel oxide layer to reduce recombination losses, achieving higher efficiency than PERC while being manufacturable on existing production lines. TOPCon N-type represents a newer generation technology with a longer performance runway as manufacturing matures.

Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W

The SIL-410-BG is Silfab's all-black residential PERC panel offering 410W with US manufacturing and a 25-year warranty.

Pros

  • + US manufactured
  • + All-black aesthetics
  • + 25-year warranty
  • + ARRA compliant

Cons

  • - Standard PERC efficiency
  • - Higher cost per watt
  • - Limited model range
View full Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W specs →

Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S delivers 410W N-type TOPCon performance in a compact residential format with a strong 25-year warranty.

Pros

  • + 25-year product warranty
  • + N-type TOPCon cells
  • + Compact size
  • + Korean quality

Cons

  • - Moderate wattage
  • - Premium pricing
  • - Limited color options
View full Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W specs →

Choose Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W If...

  • Homeowners wanting US-made, all-black panels with Buy America compliance.

Choose Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W If...

  • Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
  • You live in a hot climate (Arizona, Texas, Florida) where heat performance matters
  • You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
  • Residential installations valuing Korean quality with strong warranty.

Our Recommendation

Recommended Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

Both the Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W and Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W are excellent solar panel options, and the margin between them is narrow. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins 3 of 5 comparison dimensions by a slim margin. Your decision may come down to local pricing, installer availability, and which specific performance metrics matter most for your project. Either product is a solid investment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a narrow margin. It leads in efficiency (21.3% vs 21.2%) and matches or exceeds on warranty (25 vs 25 years). For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.

Which panel is more efficient, Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W at 21.3% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 0.1 percentage points translates to approximately 0W per panel under standard test conditions.

Which has a better warranty, Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?

The Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W comes with a 25-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W offers 25-year product and 25-year performance warranties. Both offer identical warranty terms.

Which panel performs better in hot weather?

The Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W has a temperature coefficient of -0.34%/°C and the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is -0.29%/°C. Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W retains more power in heat — important in states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.

How many Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W vs Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?

For an 8 kW system: you need 20 Silfab SIL-410-BG 410W panels (410W each) or 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels (410W each). Both require the same number of panels.

Related Resources

Last updated: February 2026