JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W vs Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

Our Verdict Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a clear margin. It offers better long-term durability with 25-year warranty. For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.

Power / Capacity
440W
vs
410W
Efficiency
22.2%
vs
21.3%
Warranty
15 yrs
vs
25 yrs

Key Differences

  • JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W is rated at 440W while Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is rated at 410W, a 30W difference.
  • JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W achieves 22.2% efficiency vs 21.3% for the other, a 0.9 percentage point gap.
  • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W comes with a 25-year product warranty vs 15 years for the other.

Specifications Breakdown

Module Efficiency

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W achieves 22.2% module efficiency compared to Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W's 21.3%, meaning JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W converts 0.9 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W produces 225.3 watts per square meter of panel area while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W produces 210.0 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.

Power Output

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W delivers 440W per panel versus 410W for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W, a 30W difference per module. To build an 8 kW residential system, you would need 19 JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W panels or 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels. Choosing the higher-wattage option saves 1 panel, reducing total racking hardware, wiring, and installation labor costs. Higher wattage per panel is particularly valuable for commercial-scale installations where panel count directly impacts balance-of-system costs.

Temperature Coefficient

Both panels share an identical temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C, meaning they lose power at the same rate as cell temperature rises above the 25°C standard test baseline. At 65°C cell temperature, both retain 94.2% of rated power. Neither panel has a thermal performance advantage, which makes this specification a non-factor in the comparison.

Warranty Coverage

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W is backed by a 15-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee, while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W offers 25-year product and 25-year performance coverage. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W provides 10 additional years of defect protection, covering manufacturing issues, material failures, and premature performance loss. Based on their published degradation rates (1% first year then 0.4%/year for JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W; 1% first year then 0.4%/year for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W), after 25 years the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W should retain approximately 89.4% of original output versus 89.4% for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W. The end-of-life output levels are closely matched.

Physical Dimensions & Weight

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W measures 1722×1134×30mm and weighs 21.5 kg, while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W measures 1722×1134×30mm at 20.8 kg. 1.95 m² of panel area for the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W versus 1.95 m² for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W. Their weights are closely matched, so neither panel imposes a significantly different structural load on the mounting system. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.

Specification Comparison

Specification JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W
Power 440W 410W
Efficiency 22.2% 21.3%
Power Density 20.9 W/sq ft 19.5 W/sq ft
Cell Type TOPCon N-type TOPCon N-type
Bifacial Yes No
Weight 21.5 kg 20.8 kg
Temp Coefficient -0.29%/°C -0.29%/°C
Snow Load 5400 Pa 5400 Pa
Wind Load 2400 Pa 2400 Pa
Product Warranty 15 years 25 years
Performance Warranty 30 years 25 years
Degradation (Year 1) 1% 1%
Annual Degradation 0.4% 0.4%
Country China South Korea

5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis

1. Efficiency & Power Density

Winner: JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W achieves 22.2% efficiency versus 21.3% — a 0.9 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 0.9 kW more total system capacity, or 5 kWh more annual production in an average US location.

2. Hot Climate Performance

Winner: Tie

Both panels share a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C — identical heat tolerance.

3. Durability & Warranty

Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W leads with a 25-year product warranty versus 15 years. After 25 years, expect 89.4% vs 89.4% of original output for JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W and Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W respectively.

4. Power Output

Winner: JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W delivers 440W versus 410W per panel — 30W more. For an 8 kW system, you need 19 panels with the higher-wattage option versus 20 panels, saving 1 panels and the associated racking and labor costs.

5. Cell Technology

Winner: Tie

Both panels use TOPCon N-type cell technology. No technology advantage for either product.

JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W

The compact Tiger Neo 440W brings N-type TOPCon performance to smaller residential rooftops with a space-efficient design.

Pros

  • + Compact N-type design
  • + 22.2% efficiency
  • + Lightweight
  • + Great for smaller roofs

Cons

  • - Lower wattage than larger models
  • - Premium over PERC panels
  • - Limited to 440W
View full JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W specs →

Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S delivers 410W N-type TOPCon performance in a compact residential format with a strong 25-year warranty.

Pros

  • + 25-year product warranty
  • + N-type TOPCon cells
  • + Compact size
  • + Korean quality

Cons

  • - Moderate wattage
  • - Premium pricing
  • - Limited color options
View full Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W specs →

Choose JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W If...

  • Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
  • You want fewer panels to reach your target system size, reducing racking and labor costs
  • You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
  • Space-constrained residential rooftops wanting N-type performance.

Choose Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W If...

  • Long-term warranty protection is a top priority and you plan to stay in your home for 25+ years
  • You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
  • Residential installations valuing Korean quality with strong warranty.

Our Recommendation

Recommended Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W

We recommend the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W for most buyers in this comparison. It wins 1 of 5 key dimensions and offers a clear advantage in the metrics that matter most for a solar panel purchase. The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W remains a good product, but the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W delivers better overall value for the majority of installations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?

The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a clear margin. It offers better long-term durability with 25-year warranty. For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.

Which panel is more efficient, JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W at 22.2% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 0.9 percentage points translates to approximately 30W per panel under standard test conditions.

Which has a better warranty, JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W comes with a 15-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W offers 25-year product and 25-year performance warranties. Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W provides 10 additional years of product coverage.

Which panel performs better in hot weather?

The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W has a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C and the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is -0.29%/°C. Both handle heat equally. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.

How many JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W vs Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?

For an 8 kW system: you need 19 JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W panels (440W each) or 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels (410W each). The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 440W requires fewer panels, saving on racking hardware and installation labor.

Related Resources

Last updated: February 2026