JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W vs Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a clear margin. It offers better long-term durability with 25-year warranty. For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.
Key Differences
- • JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W is rated at 475W while Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is rated at 410W, a 65W difference.
- • JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W achieves 22.6% efficiency vs 21.3% for the other, a 1.3 percentage point gap.
- • Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W comes with a 25-year product warranty vs 15 years for the other.
Specifications Breakdown
Module Efficiency
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W achieves 22.6% module efficiency compared to Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W's 21.3%, meaning JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W converts 1.3 percentage points more sunlight into electricity per square meter. In practical terms, the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W produces 237.7 watts per square meter of panel area while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W produces 210.0 W/m². For rooftop installations where space is limited, this efficiency gap determines how many kilowatts you can fit on your available roof area. Over a 25-year system life, even a small efficiency advantage compounds into meaningful additional energy production.
Power Output
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W delivers 475W per panel versus 410W for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W, a 65W difference per module. To build an 8 kW residential system, you would need 17 JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W panels or 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels. Choosing the higher-wattage option saves 3 panels, reducing total racking hardware, wiring, and installation labor costs. Higher wattage per panel is particularly valuable for commercial-scale installations where panel count directly impacts balance-of-system costs.
Temperature Coefficient
Both panels share an identical temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C, meaning they lose power at the same rate as cell temperature rises above the 25°C standard test baseline. At 65°C cell temperature, both retain 94.2% of rated power. Neither panel has a thermal performance advantage, which makes this specification a non-factor in the comparison.
Warranty Coverage
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W is backed by a 15-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee, while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W offers 25-year product and 25-year performance coverage. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W provides 10 additional years of defect protection, covering manufacturing issues, material failures, and premature performance loss. Based on their published degradation rates (1% first year then 0.4%/year for JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W; 1% first year then 0.4%/year for Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W), after 25 years the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W should retain approximately 89.4% of original output versus 89.4% for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W. The end-of-life output levels are closely matched.
Physical Dimensions & Weight
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W measures 1762×1134×30mm and weighs 23.5 kg, while the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W measures 1722×1134×30mm at 20.8 kg. 2.00 m² of panel area for the JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W versus 1.95 m² for the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is 2.7 kg lighter per panel, which reduces structural load requirements on the roof and makes handling easier during installation. For a 20-panel system, that is a total weight difference of 54 kg. Similar footprints mean both panels fit comparably on standard residential rooftop configurations.
Specification Comparison
| Specification | JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W | Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 475W | 410W |
| Efficiency | 22.6% | 21.3% |
| Power Density | 22.1 W/sq ft | 19.5 W/sq ft |
| Cell Type | TOPCon N-type | TOPCon N-type |
| Bifacial | Yes | No |
| Weight | 23.5 kg | 20.8 kg |
| Temp Coefficient | -0.29%/°C | -0.29%/°C |
| Snow Load | 5400 Pa | 5400 Pa |
| Wind Load | 2400 Pa | 2400 Pa |
| Product Warranty | 15 years | 25 years |
| Performance Warranty | 30 years | 25 years |
| Degradation (Year 1) | 1% | 1% |
| Annual Degradation | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Country | China | South Korea |
5-Dimension Head-to-Head Analysis
1. Efficiency & Power Density
Winner: JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475WThe JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W achieves 22.6% efficiency versus 21.3% — a 1.3 percentage point advantage. On a typical 30-panel residential roof, this translates to approximately 1.9 kW more total system capacity, or 9 kWh more annual production in an average US location.
2. Hot Climate Performance
Winner: TieBoth panels share a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C — identical heat tolerance.
3. Durability & Warranty
Winner: Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410WHanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W leads with a 25-year product warranty versus 15 years. After 25 years, expect 89.4% vs 89.4% of original output for JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W and Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W respectively.
4. Power Output
Winner: JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475WThe JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W delivers 475W versus 410W per panel — 65W more. For an 8 kW system, you need 17 panels with the higher-wattage option versus 20 panels, saving 3 panels and the associated racking and labor costs.
5. Cell Technology
Winner: TieBoth panels use TOPCon N-type cell technology. No technology advantage for either product.
JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W
JinkoSolar Tiger Neo is a premium N-type TOPCon panel delivering 475W with industry-leading 22.6% efficiency for residential use.
Pros
- + Excellent 22.6% efficiency
- + Leading N-type technology
- + Strong low-light performance
- + Tier 1 bankability
Cons
- - Premium pricing
- - Moderate availability
- - Heavier than some competitors
Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S delivers 410W N-type TOPCon performance in a compact residential format with a strong 25-year warranty.
Pros
- + 25-year product warranty
- + N-type TOPCon cells
- + Compact size
- + Korean quality
Cons
- - Moderate wattage
- - Premium pricing
- - Limited color options
Choose JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W If...
- ✓ Your roof space is limited and you need maximum power per panel
- ✓ You want fewer panels to reach your target system size, reducing racking and labor costs
- ✓ You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
- ✓ Premium residential installations demanding top-tier efficiency.
Choose Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W If...
- ✓ Long-term warranty protection is a top priority and you plan to stay in your home for 25+ years
- ✓ You prefer newer cell technology with a longer performance improvement runway
- ✓ Residential installations valuing Korean quality with strong warranty.
Our Recommendation
We recommend the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W for most buyers in this comparison. It wins 1 of 5 key dimensions and offers a clear advantage in the metrics that matter most for a solar panel purchase. The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W remains a good product, but the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W delivers better overall value for the majority of installations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?
The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W wins this comparison by a clear margin. It offers better long-term durability with 25-year warranty. For most residential installations, the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is the stronger choice.
Which panel is more efficient, JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W at 22.6% module efficiency. Higher efficiency means more watts per square foot of roof space, which is critical for space-constrained installations. The difference of 1.3 percentage points translates to approximately 65W per panel under standard test conditions.
Which has a better warranty, JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W or Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W?
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W comes with a 15-year product warranty and 30-year performance guarantee. The Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W offers 25-year product and 25-year performance warranties. Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W provides 10 additional years of product coverage.
Which panel performs better in hot weather?
The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W has a temperature coefficient of -0.29%/°C and the Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W is -0.29%/°C. Both handle heat equally. A lower (less negative) temperature coefficient is better.
How many JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W vs Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels do I need for an 8 kW system?
For an 8 kW system: you need 17 JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W panels (475W each) or 20 Hanwha Q.TRON G11S 410W panels (410W each). The JinkoSolar Tiger Neo 475W requires fewer panels, saving on racking hardware and installation labor.
Related Resources
Last updated: February 2026